Feminismo con ideología?

A quién pertenece el feminismo?


Existe el feminismo conservador?


Trasciende el feminismo la ideología política? En el caso estadounidense, trasciende al partido Demócrata?

Qué es el feminismo o qué implica ser feminista?

Tú que opinas?

The Opinionator
Feminism´s Party Lines da la oportunidad de comentar acerca del tema, vale la pena leer los comentarios.

Aquí un par:


The only thing keeping conservatives out of feminism is the way they deal with being pro-life.
Regardless of what a woman believes is right when it comes to abortion, if the government legislates what we can and cannot do with our bodies, we will never be equal. We cannot be equal if the government has a claim to the life that grows inside of us, but has no similar claim to a man’s body.
Does that mean you can’t be pro-life and feminist? No. But it does mean that you can’t be pro-pro-life legislation and feminist.
I consider myself a pro-choice pro-lifer. I’m liberal to the core but I do believe that life begins at conception and abortion is not a great choice. But I also believe and will fight for a woman’s right to make that choice.
I would rather see conservative pro-lifers focus on building a better adoption system, pregnancy clinics that offer resources and better pay for early childhood teachers. If that is the aim of a pro-life proponent, then in all other ways, feminism really is for everybody.
— Posted by femmeknitzi

I think confusion arises because not all women-even working or politically engaged women- are feminists! I find it hard to see someone as a feminist, regardless of his/her party affiliation, who does not believe in a woman’s right to choose.
In addition to policy positions, I am also disappointed when feminists in positions of power do not set an example that supports women rights. I was very disappointed to see how little maternity leave Sarah Palin took after the birth of her children. I see the right to paid parental leave as a major issue in creating workplaces that support both men, women, and families. If Sarah Palin wants to been a feminist leader (and I’m not sure she really does) then I wish she would have used her position of power to normalize parental leaves. This help women in less powerful positions comfortably take their legally allowed six weeks of leave without fear of being penalized.
— Posted by Tenley

You’re asking the wrong questions. Feminism, or more specifically in this case, Palin’s gender has nothing to do with the anger of many voters, men and women, for two simple reasons: 1) she is completely unqualified for the position she seeks; and 2) whether McCain knows that or not, he’s using her. And that’s why ALL feminists should be outraged. To put it another way, Hillary Clinton has all of the qualifications for the office she sought, but her loss upset a great many women, and maybe rightly so. But those who defend Palin ONLY because she’s a woman should be ashamed of themselves.
— Posted by James Tedesco

Sphere: Related Content